Minutes of the
FACULTY SENATE MEETING
APPROVED
PRESENT: Chris
Barkley, Bill Bedford, Mike Byron, Judy Cater, MaryAnn Drinan, Nancy Galli, Katheryn Garlow, Doug Key, Stan Levy, Mario
Mendez, Maria Miller, Ruben Murcia, Morgan Peterson, Suzann Norton, Jose
Rangel, Joe Stanford, Fari Towfiq, Rocco Versaci, April Woods
ABSENT: Mike
Arguello, Monika Brannick, Sara Thompson, Anne Voth
GUESTS: Judy
Fish, Suzanne Gavin, Karie Lord,
CALL
TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by the president, Chris
Barkley, at
Approval
of Minutes: The minutes of
April
29th Agenda: Chris Barkley reported that as
requested by Senators, Dr. Amador has been invited to attend the April 29th
Senate meeting but will not discuss salary or other negotiated items.
Discussion followed on whether she should be invited to address her reasoning
in giving the other employee groups their salary increases while negotiations
with faculty members were not completed. She said she would be willing to
discuss her view of some of Palomar’s problems, like Peoplesoft.
Senate members agreed that in order to keep the lines of communication open,
Dr. Amador should be asked to attend an upcoming Senate meeting and to address
issues such as academic and professional matters, as well as the restructuring
of instructional planning.
Faculty
Senate
Elections: Stan
Levy reported that the ballots to fill upcoming Senate vacancies have been sent
out. Because there are more candidates from the Life Sciences and Math
Departments than there are vacancies for those departments, if individuals from
those departments are in the top nine spots for contract faculty, the highest
vote-getters will be elected.
Committee
Appointments:
Motion 1 MSC
Research
Award: Chris Barkley reported that application packets for
the Research Award are in the Senate office. A small group of Senators will
review the materials and present their recommendations at the April 29th
meeting.
Strategic
Planning
Council: Nancy
Galli provided the following Strategic Planning Council report on the proposed additions to the four planning
council documents currently being sunshined, some of which were proposed by
faculty:
·
A suggestion to
add the Chief of Police to the Administrative Services Planning Council.
·
A suggestion to
add 1 additional classified staff member to the Instructional Planning Council
and the Student Services Planning Council.
·
A suggestion to
add the Staff Development Diversity Coordinator to the Human Resource Services
Planning Council.
·
A suggestion to
add a marketing person to the Instructional and Student Services councils as a
non-voting members.
·
It is being
recommended that the each of the planning councils create an annual progress
report.
Chris Barkley and Bob Gilson have agreed to serve as
the faculty representatives on the writing team to pull together the
suggestions received from the surveys.
Nancy Galli added that additional comments received
during the sunshining process will be presented for Senate discussion on April
29th.
Academic Standards
&
Practices: Joe Stanford distributed the following
memorandum from the Academic Standards & Practices Committee as a result of
their meeting on
To: Faculty
Senate,
From: Academic
Standards and Practices Committee
Subject:
Recommendations regarding Hiring procedures at
1.
In recognition of
the need for the hiring of new faculty at Palomar College to begin earlier in
the school year than we have done in the past, the ASPC recommends that the senate
relay the message to administration that budget projections and prioritization
of faculty positions must be made no later than October first of each school
year to begin the hiring process.
2.
To assist
committees in conducting interviews in an equitable and legally appropriate
manner, ASPC recommends that Human Resources be requested to make a video of
the rules and regulations for committee members, and that all members of the
hiring committee be required to view the presentation before screening and interviewing
of candidates can begin.
3.
Because of the
desire to hire the best candidate possible, and to investigate fully the
qualifications of each candidate, ASPC recommends that the following be added
to the faculty manual under BP 174 Faculty Hiring: Policy and Criteria Responsibility: “Follow-up
questions may be asked, as long as they do not lead the candidate to a desired
response, and stay within the scope of the original answer. In addition, information on the application,
resume, or portfolio may be specifically addressed if not included in the
original answer (and remains in the scope of the original question).” It is also recommended that these
instructions be included in the Human Resources training manual.
4.
In regard to the
tier system ASPC recommends that the dean be made a member of the first level
of interviews as a non voting member.
The dean would not screen the applicants, but sit in on all first level
interviews and teaching demonstrations.
The second and final level interviews would include the dean, vice
president of instruction, the college president, and faculty from the first
level committee.
Lengthy discussion followed on the recommendations
listed, particularly #4 and the suggestion that deans be involved in the first
level of the interview process. Joe indicated that there was much discussion on
that point at the meeting of April 11th, and there seemed to be agreement that
if the dean were put on the committee at the first level as a non-voting
member, there would not be a need for him or her to screen the applications
which may alleviate the concern relating to time constraints, as well include representation
on the committee by the administration. Most Senate members disagreed with item
#4, stating the need for specific clarification on what the role of the dean
would be. Some Senate members suggested leaving the current tier structure the
way it currently exists rather than moving to this suggested format. There was agreement by Senate members in
relation to item #1 and the need for prioritizing of needed positions in the
Spring so faculty hiring can begin early in the academic year, and that job
announcements should be ready to go out by October 1st. Senate
members agreed that items 1-3 should be presented for incorporation into the
procedure, and that item 4 should be removed.
Motion
2 MSC
Key, Galli: To extend the meeting.
CalWorks Funded
Positions: Maria
Miller reported on the possible elimination of the CalWorks funded positions.
The three positions, as well as many services to students, may be eliminated if
financing for these programs and positions is not found. The
Motion 3 MSCU
Norton, Versaci: Move the issue of CalWorks Funded positions to Action.
Motion 4 MSCU
Miller, Woods: The Faculty Senate is concerned about the loss of vital student
services and is directing the Faculty Senate President to bring the issue of Student Employment Services (funded by CalWorks) to the Strategic Planning Council with the
recommendation that funds be sought through the general fund.
Flier: Chris
Barkley responded to inquiries made by some Senate members on a flier which was
distributed to faculty members critical of the Faculty Senate and endorsing
certain faculty members for Senate membership. She indicated that the flier was
not distributed by the Palomar Faculty Federation, and the Faculty Council and
the PFF will distribute a response to this to acknowledge that PFF is not
endorsing anyone and applauds the number of faculty members running for the
Senate.
Other: Mario
Mendez provided the following CTA report:
Current
federal law could cost you up to two-thirds of the Social Security benefits you
and many educators may have earned. Working with the National Education
Association and CTA, you can do something about it!
NEA
has mounted a national mobilization to urge Congress to repeal two federal laws
– the “Government Pension Offset” (GPO) and “Windfall Elimination Provision”
(WEP). These current laws reduce Social
Security benefits to public employees in 15 states, including
The “Government Pension Offset” reduces benefit payments
to those who qualify for Social Security through their spouse’s employment. The
“Windfall Elimination Provision” (WEP) reduced benefits for those who qualify
through their own employment prior to public service.
Congress is considering two bills to repeal the GPO
and WEP: H.R. 2638 by Congressman Buck McKeon and S. 1523 by Senator Dianne
Feinstein.
Already there are 125 co-sponsors on the McKeon bill,
and we’re getting more every day.
On May 1, call Senator Barbara Boxer at (415) 403-0100
or (213) 894-5000 and your member of Congress and urge them to support the
bills and sign on as co-authors.
Mario added that a flier providing more information on
this is being sent out to faculty members with the Senate Motions this week.
Palomar Faculty
Federation:
Adjunct
Faculty: Mike Byron reported that he attended an AFT Union
Conference in
Other: Chris
Barkley reported that she has received a couple of notes from some classified
staff members regarding the Coalition of Democratic Educators. The Senate is in
no way connected to this organization.
STRS
Rules: For retired faculty now working as adjuncts:
Beginning
in 2001-2002,coursework taught during the summer by retired faculty now counts
against their annual earnings limit. As a result, this summer many adjunct
faculty members who are retirees will feel the pinch of this rule change. If
they teach this summer, then they most likely will not be eligible to teach in
the fall because they will have hit their earnings ceilings.
Thank
You: Chris
Barkley read a card from Karan Huskey
thanking the Faculty Senate for supporting the Counseling Department during the
stressful layoff period and expressing gratitude for the efforts made by the Senate
in fighting for those faculty positions.
ADJOURNMENT: The
meeting was adjourned at
Respectfully
submitted,
April
Woods, Secretary